Question 05
Why should you trust us?
Check our incentives. Our bottom line is directly tied to the value we deliver for you.
We refund fees and offer fee structures with no base fee i.e., our funds only charge fees when we outperform. Asset management has a “heads I win, tails you lose” problem. Managers do extraordinarily well when they perform and really well when they don’t. They never really feel the pain.
We go to great lengths to make sure that our interests are aligned with our clients’. When we outperform, fees go into a reserve held for you, and when we underperform, refunds come out of the reserve back to you. This ensures that our success is directly tied to yours. You'll struggle to find another structure quite like it.
Asset managers should earn their fees, not simply collect them.
“Heads I win, tails you lose.” Who in their right mind would take that bet? And yet it's still the industry default on fees. The odds have been stacked in managers’ favour most of the time, with fee structures that pay out regardless of the outcome for clients.
We reject this idea. Call us crazy, but we believe asset managers should earn their fees, not simply collect a toll. All of our strategies offer fee structures that have a performance component, and for almost 25 years we’ve offered a refundable performance fee. For clients who opt for that fee structure this is how it works. When we outperform, a performance fee is set aside in a reserve. When we underperform, we refund fees back out of that reserve. Upside and downside, shared. It's an unusual arrangement, and it concentrates the mind wonderfully. It ensures that our interests are aligned as our success is directly tied to the outcomes we deliver for clients.
Alignment should leave evidence
Clients also behave differently, in exactly the way you'd expect. The hardest moment for any long-term investor is the bottom of a long period of underperformance, when the urge to sell is strongest and the cost of selling is highest. When the fee reserve is paying refunds through that period, clients have a reason to stay that goes beyond willpower, and fee refunds cushion the blow of underperformance. The evidence: in 2008, with global markets down 35% and no gates or lockups holding anyone in, we saw net redemptions of less than 10%—albeit across different funds and fee structures than those in place today. Our clients held their nerve partly because they knew we were also feeling the pain. That was enough to get them to stay invested over the tough times. That’s what it means to be in it together.
Only pay for active investing when we beat the benchmark
31 Dec 2025 I Source: FE Analytics. Based on an ‘average’ Ongoing Charges Figure (OCF) of 0.91% for active funds in the IA Global and IA Mixed Investments 40-85% shares sectors. Performance data based on 5 year performance of funds in the IA Global and IA Mixed Investments 40-85% shares at 31 December 2025.
“Heads I win, tails you lose.” Who in their right mind would take that bet? And yet it's still the industry default on fees. The odds have been stacked in managers’ favour most of the time, with fee structures that pay out regardless of the outcome for clients.
Asset managers should earn their fees, not simply collect them.
We reject this idea. Call us crazy, but we believe asset managers should earn their fees, not simply collect a toll. All of our strategies offer fee structures that have a performance component, and for almost 25 years we’ve offered a refundable performance fee. For clients who opt for that fee structure this is how it works. When we outperform, a performance fee is set aside in a reserve. When we underperform, we refund fees back out of that reserve. Upside and downside, shared. It's an unusual arrangement, and it concentrates the mind wonderfully. It ensures that our interests are aligned as our success is directly tied to the outcomes we deliver for clients.
Alignment should leave evidence
Clients also behave differently, in exactly the way you'd expect. The hardest moment for any long-term investor is the bottom of a long period of underperformance, when the urge to sell is strongest and the cost of selling is highest. When the fee reserve is paying refunds through that period, clients have a reason to stay that goes beyond willpower, and fee refunds cushion the blow of underperformance. The evidence: in 2008, with global markets down 35% and no gates or lockups holding anyone in, we saw net redemptions of less than 10%—albeit across different funds and fee structures than those in place today. Our clients held their nerve partly because they knew we were also feeling the pain. That was enough to get them to stay invested over the tough times. That’s what it means to be in it together.
Only pay for active investing when we beat the benchmark
31 Dec 2025 I Source: FE Analytics. Based on an ‘average’ Ongoing Charges Figure (OCF) of 0.91% for active funds in the IA Global and IA Mixed Investments 40-85% shares sectors. Performance data based on 5 year performance of funds in the IA Global and IA Mixed Investments 40-85% shares at 31 December 2025.
Keep exploring our questions
©All rights reserved 2026
Approved for issue in the United Kingdom by Orbis Investments (U.K.) Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Orbis Investments (U.K.) Limited is incorporated in England & Wales under company number 8138002. Registered office address: 28 Dorset Square, London, NW1 6QG.